Jump to Navigation
Free ConsultationEvenings and Weekends by Appointment
877.528.1399Toll Free

Recent Court Decisions Impacting Pennsylvania Workers' Comp - Part 2

Last week we discussed two recent Pennsylvania cases dealing with workers' compensation issues. This week we will highlight two additional decisions.

In Rhonda Walker v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board a worker fell at work and injured her nose. This resulted in the woman having a slightly crooked nose, and the woman filed a disfigurement claim.

In Pennsylvania, a person is entitled to a specific loss claim for disfigurement if the injury caused a permanent, unsightly scar above the clavicle. The issue for this case was whether the woman's slight nose disfigurement entitled her to specific loss for a disfigurement claim.

The court ruled that having a slightly crooked nose is not considered unsightly, and therefore the woman was not entitled to compensation for a disfigurement claim. The case will impact future claims when a worker's scar or disfigurement is less noticeable. In such cases, workers' disfigurement claims may be completely denied.

Another important decision was the Six Ls Packing Company v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board. In this case a large farming company hired various truck carriers to transport its produce. A truck driver became injured and filed a claim against the owner of the truck and independent contractor of the farming company.

Since the truck owner lacked workers' compensation coverage the driver then filed against the farming company. The question was whether the farming company was liable as a statutory employer. The statutory employer theory is generally used in construction cases, where injured workers can sue a general contractor if a subcontractor does not have insurance.

The court ruled the farming company was liable; and that businesses that regularly contract with others for work need to ensure their subcontractors carry workers' compensation insurance. Otherwise, the business employing the subcontractors will be liable for claims. This broadening of the statutory employer theory is a victory for Pennsylvania injured workers.

Source: Claims Journal, "Pennsylvania Workers' Comp Case Update," Denise Johnson, July 30, 2012.

Our firm handles workers' compensation cases. For further information please visit our Pennsylvania workers' compensation page.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
FindLaw Network Subscribe to This Blog's Feed

Contact Our Firm Today
Free Case Evaluation Form

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

we wrote the book on workers comp

The Injured Worker’s Guide to Compensation Law in Pennsylvania

Contact us to get a copy.


Multi-Million Dollar Advocates ForumMillion Dollar Advocates ForumSuperLawyersLitigator Awards 2014 Ranked Top 1% Lawyers Brain InjuryTHE NATIONAL TRIAL LAWYERS | TOP 100 TRIAL LAWYERS Pennsylvania Association for Justice Pennsylvania Bar Association Shollenberger Januzzi & Wolfe, LLP BBB Business Review Before choosing a personal injury lawyer, Get the Facts: Law Fact 866-Law-Fact www.sholljanlaw.com Shollenberger Januzzi & Wolfe Attorneys At Law
S&J ${site.data.firmName} Attorneys at Law

Our Office Locations

 Shollenberger Januzzi & Wolfe, LLP
2225 Millennium Way
Enola, PA 17025

Enola Law Office Map

 Shollenberger Januzzi & Wolfe, LLP
4811 Jonestown Road, Suite 221
Harrisburg, PA 17109

Harrisburg Law Office Map

Phone: 717-260-3549 | Toll Free: 877-528-1399 | Fax: 717-728-3400